

I’m not willing to risk that it might be true
I’m not willing to risk that it might be true
trustworthiness is always a matter of opinion.
the post is mostly verifiable information with two sentences of speculation that you seem to think is the crux of what I said, when, in fact, all I said is that routing traffic through Israel dimishes my trust in proton.
it’s not circular logic. if you don’t know, you can just not say things.
I read it when it was published and stashed it for opportunities like this.
the post is the evidence.
the claim isn’t that Israel is hacking proton. the claim is that proton routed traffic through an IDF affiliate.
I did provide evidence. you’re asking for more evidence.
I don’t trust proton. if you think you can trust proton, feel free to use them.
routing traffic through Israel is not fine.
stux blocked at least one of my fediverse identities and I recognize I’m not objective but if he can’t keep the instance online then like ok.
none of your arguments will hold water with the lived experience of most people. they don’t want to see the disappointment in their grandma’s eyes over something they don’t believe, themselves, to be a just reason for turning down her cooking. they didn’t see a problem with grabbing some food on their way to make the world a better place. your grandstanding is not only ineffective: it comes across as bizarre and unhinged.
I’m blocking you
oh thank god
You don’t argue in any sense of data or fact, just shitty little retorts amounting to nothing more than “no, actually”.
there’s no data you’ve presented to discuss
you’re the worst, most bad faith debater I’ve ever had the displeasure of talking to
your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith
convenience isn’t a valid reason to do wrong
we’ve been over this: most people don’t think it’s wrong.
culture doesn’t permit amoral acts
we’ve been over this.
it’s one reason among many.